(This is 50th
anniversary of my first article in Runner’s World magazine.
All year I post excerpts from my book, This Runner’s World.)
MARCH 1996 (retitled without the question mark in the magazine). Women once protested, picketed and petitioned their
way into “men’s” road races. They found widespread support for their cause,
with much of it coming from the male runners who welcomed these women.
Twenty-five
years later, women have events all their own. A few men now want to enter these
races, and they charge “sex discrimination” when they’re turned away as
unwelcome party-crashers. These men draw little sympathy for their cause,
either from women or men.
So
why are women-only races okay if men-only events aren’t? A tough question.
This
issue reared up most prominently in Minneapolis last fall, where a male
runner’s lawsuit led to cancellation of a women’s 10K race with an 18-year
history. Similar incidents with less serious consequences have occurred
recently in other U.S. cities.
These
crusades for equality are misplaced. They fail to recognize that road running
is at once a traditionally democratic sport and inherently unequal.
Running
opened to women before Title IX forced other sports to do so. When the first
pioneers arrived in our sport in the 1960s, they had nowhere else to run but
with the men. There were too few women then to support races of their own.
Women-only
racing began with the New York Mini-Marathon, Bonne Bell and Avon series of the
early 1970s. No one complained then about “special rights.” Men applauded the
women’s sport for growing up enough to stand alone sometimes.
The
growth led eventually to separate Women’s Olympic Trials, Races for the Cure
and RRCA Women’s Distance Festivals. But the women still haven’t caught up
completely with men. In numbers and speed, maybe they never will.
Women
are still outnumbered in any open road races, typically accounting for
one-quarter to one-third of the total field. And given the inequities of gender
genetics, a woman almost never finishes first overall.
These
two factors can make the women’s division of a mixed race seem less important
than the men’s. In theory, the sexes don’t compete directly with each other,
but the competition remains unequal. Top men race only against each other,
while the best women see mostly men around them. More glory typically goes to
the man out front than to the lead woman lost in the crowd.
Women
can’t always run apart, and probably wouldn’t want to if they could. But they
deserve some of what men have always had: chances to run among themselves, to
race only with equals and to cross the finish line first.
Road
racing has a proud history of openness. Our sport doesn’t discriminate by age,
race, class, creed, speed, size or sex. Everyone has the opportunity to race
somewhere – but no one gets to race everywhere.
Sometimes
the vast melting pot of running becomes overwhelming in its size and diversity.
We occasionally need to split off from the mass, into smaller and more
specialized groupings.
This
subdividing is also in the best tradition of the sport. We’ve created many new
options for selected runners while leaving most opportunities available to all.
We have races like Boston and the Olympic Trials that are limited to the fast,
we have races limited to kids and to masters, we have races limited to
corporate and relay teams.
Women-only
races serve the same purpose by making up for the sport’s inherent inequities –
past, present and perhaps future. Races of their own give the women something
extra while depriving the men of nothing they couldn’t find somewhere else that
same weekend. This is affirmative action at its best.
2018 Update. Last week I
talked on stage with one of the first women of distance running, Joan Benoit
Samuelson. One of her post-Olympics promises was to bring more people into
running, regardless of gender. This has happened, especially with women.
[Many books of mine, old
and recent, are now available in two different formats: in print and as ebooks
from Amazon.com. The titles: Going Far, Home Runs, Joe’s Team, Learning to
Walk, Long Run Solution, Long Slow Distance, Miles to Go, Pacesetters, Run
Right Now, Run Right Now Training Log, See How We Run, Starting Lines, and This
Runner’s World, plus Rich Englehart’s book about me, Slow Joe.]
No comments:
Post a Comment